The nature of media-Bitches
Everyone knows the moment in life where you realize that the pig through the neighboring village and is not driven by own. In most cases, this neighboring village, a youth camp with banner ads and the media a very young, impressionable audience. For example, the German music channel have already produced quite a few pigs.
Think of Gülcan, Eni van de artist name, the new pretty boy with no name of Viva or this is self-signed duo Claassen and beanpole: pedophile pop stars, where the artificial applause is bewildered adolescent somehow gone to his head. It's real always interesting that these people take some time really seriously. What humor
know these people? You know the smile that you are aware of the hatred, they are aware of the charts as a means of their first-hype. But the excitement and entertainment they produce normal people who have displaced Christian Ulmen, Nora Tschirner, Schlingensief, Raab and Charlotte R.? Your Freakness alone is the Handedness, the self-praise, the tribute of their own self purpose in the casual role of a facilitator. You are seeking what many teenagers: The simulated Bewusstsin of self-importance - these are based now on a job in the media, on a play feature of the personality or the loss of the special non-commitment unit complements long enough about the opening of the mouth to cover up by invading program events .
Most of these pigs are signs of embarrassment, that works as a screen for young people. The Wohlfühlkonzpt the youth channel is a nest of "I-white-and-not-why-I-just-look at all the" posturing that will accompany them with cameras and revive with studio audience clapping. The
But try as they Kameranuckler Claassen-man and his bird in Gosejohann-style (after all, who has practiced the rocking early in his life) to make Street Comedy has to do with the normal self-esteem anymore. These people, who are used, that their appearance is pure from their usual U14 audience already perceived as a kind of cool and funny, have no street sense of humor. That are both as a duo, here is already significant: If they did not acknowledge each other, they would probably see already on the set that no one laughs at them.
Gosejohann tries to provoke and taboos the public address and does it without hesitation fun of himself. Even Elton, who actually is not funny, makes fun at himself. The new pigs are the Jugenfernsehens but since its existence - as above - busy somehow, to come selbstbelustigt and no longer able to risk themselves or others. If they were to meet me in town: I was wasting time so, any identity, authenticity can be seen in her eyes and would give them compassionate with the way that it can create all: even you! But the biographies of these people know no failure. Probably they are even proud of himself themselves and believe they have something real.
time: during the ProSieben show
Status: incredibly bored by the sows in the neighboring village and drunk.
Occasion: Claassen, and the other would be what with the microphone and the Möchtergern alternative style
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Peter Reinhart Bread Baker Apprentice
Individual ideology
when the idea to think beyond themselves, would not it logical? What if the policy itself is an ideology and its dissemination needs said pointedly brainwashed? Some rumors even of a post-ideological era, because the known Orientation patterns are there. Does this trend then the social as an ideology, an ideology of solidarity and the political in excess of the selfishness?
Of course, here the term 'ideology' - probably as misunderstood reimport this old German concept of education - first of its negative connotation free: An ideology is not an aberration, not irrationality, not a blind following a sectarian cult with crude assumptions. The ideology is a perfect idea of this world and the derived logic for thinking and acting. In his previous role was the Enlightenment ideology of a progressive thinking, no base for deadlock blame or somewhat conservative. That the term now in common usage for something rigid, absolute, backward-looking as we owe to the defamation of the 60s: a derogatory term for all battle fronts.
The ideology is therefore to be something political, since it is based on the conviction of an idea that goes beyond the self also, because it contains the whole world as normative. But conversely, the political always an ideology? Here, opinions differ .. Is the harsh reality of this world is not a structure that is already inherent in the logic of a policy that one would ask. Are our political actions allegedly anything at all outside of the existing discourse of the possibilities of our actions in advance but defined and limited? Others would perhaps put the 'pragmatics' as an example, that political action can also be non-ideological.
I do not think that the political is logical: those who can afford it, will abstain from progressive ideology - Marx knew the way, always been that people first go together really dirty needs in order to change this world somehow fundamentally . Does the policy so indoctrinated in the luxury children's brains and snob imitators? And who would do this? I do not think that something like this can be institutionalized. There has probably contribute to each his part. Even our young people looking for meaning and ideas for this world. Let's show them that no one thought them decreases, and each must develop its own ideology.
time: pre-ideological
Status: drunken sense of mission
Occasion: rescue the concept of ideology.
when the idea to think beyond themselves, would not it logical? What if the policy itself is an ideology and its dissemination needs said pointedly brainwashed? Some rumors even of a post-ideological era, because the known Orientation patterns are there. Does this trend then the social as an ideology, an ideology of solidarity and the political in excess of the selfishness?
Of course, here the term 'ideology' - probably as misunderstood reimport this old German concept of education - first of its negative connotation free: An ideology is not an aberration, not irrationality, not a blind following a sectarian cult with crude assumptions. The ideology is a perfect idea of this world and the derived logic for thinking and acting. In his previous role was the Enlightenment ideology of a progressive thinking, no base for deadlock blame or somewhat conservative. That the term now in common usage for something rigid, absolute, backward-looking as we owe to the defamation of the 60s: a derogatory term for all battle fronts.
The ideology is therefore to be something political, since it is based on the conviction of an idea that goes beyond the self also, because it contains the whole world as normative. But conversely, the political always an ideology? Here, opinions differ .. Is the harsh reality of this world is not a structure that is already inherent in the logic of a policy that one would ask. Are our political actions allegedly anything at all outside of the existing discourse of the possibilities of our actions in advance but defined and limited? Others would perhaps put the 'pragmatics' as an example, that political action can also be non-ideological.
I do not think that the political is logical: those who can afford it, will abstain from progressive ideology - Marx knew the way, always been that people first go together really dirty needs in order to change this world somehow fundamentally . Does the policy so indoctrinated in the luxury children's brains and snob imitators? And who would do this? I do not think that something like this can be institutionalized. There has probably contribute to each his part. Even our young people looking for meaning and ideas for this world. Let's show them that no one thought them decreases, and each must develop its own ideology.
time: pre-ideological
Status: drunken sense of mission
Occasion: rescue the concept of ideology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)