Maybe it just me my head so amazed by alcohol, but I have a feeling that we are aware of the effects of a life in systems not yet. If you answer people questions about the meaning of an activity such as internetwork must, that's a bad sign. The raison d'être of human products is explained not just from the old world that is in clear systems and their production of meaning thought. I'm sorry, dear Luhmann from adults.
Yes, yes, yes is good: I know the monopolization of the term 'communication' by Luhmann. It remains the probelms of deductive, that explains so much new verkarmpft only, probably because the student brought the young heroes take the professor's hair in order to protect the neck hairs of his future auditors and not to disturb his rest autopoeitische. The old thinking does exist even in this world: It was indeed a revolution in the true sense of the break! We are living through a perpetual transition over several generations. But now to the new.
First off is the aspect Input / Output totally confused. The publication has become so easy that everyone on different platforms is already outputter. The pure consumption happens: clear. But a real meaning in a world of geographical proximity has become a shit, just the things (and people) that communicate . This communication has lost the form of dialogue by publishing circuits, such as Facebook or Twitter, long ago. In the future, it is more likely to go to individual short-lived phase in which one input or output is generated and wishes.
The aspect 'sense' has also become very fluid. Why certain things are popular, has not necessarily something to do with approval or rejection, but only with their Aufregungspotenzial and will be distributed solely because they are quasi gestures of entertainment, where you - sound like a tautology that may - see a proliferation potential. their right to exist is so you success and would cease to be defined by a gatekeeper, usually normative, civil or economic value. (Yes yes yes: there are agenda setting, I allow myself clear here, the actual state leave to time the communication scientists, nor the Foucauldian discourse, I leave it now from the outside.).
I guess on my part, that the number of those who already have an opinion or the consolidated itself Positions for their egos do, there will be more than those who want to be inspired - a legacy of the civil, set individualism. In this respect, would see proportionally more than outputter or brakes, for as Inputter / reader / viewer .
Does this imbalance? It is making objects that show up by the networks in common, they spread as something separate and uses them to yourself to confirm to the outside. The boundaries here at first, with the only difference being that the use or "Konsumat" is felt more as a separate product and just restrict the dissemination or the sense in networks represent. (I come not now with Luhmann just because you recognize a scheme, I want to something else beyond)
But what happens to the networks when they are dominated mainly by output stages are translated individuals involved in the sense of production in the sense described above no longer participate because they are indeed hard disc but not produce their own emotions out of small talk more? They (the networks) are paradoxically youthful.
The Hype-demand in the network will always find outputter who still believe in inspiration and poetic act. These are habitually the renewable, young people and their hooligans storm and stress phases. It is also still a small number of creative journalists, broadcasters, artists, intellectuals and waste type, facing a larger number of consumers. Unfortunately, the latter will perceive, however, made the input of the intelligent inspirers as their own output in the network and rarely pay for the inspiring, for some intangible power: Sad but true.
The only responsibility that you can exercise on the basis of a network that is based on distribution, is to communicate. But even that is many, just too much. The mouse click (like whether share. Or retweet), one would be too much, because many more even in the existence of authors believe they are not responsible for. who understands himself as a pure outputter, is outdated and does not understand the network society. The imbalance between little input and more output Tern Tern can function in the long run only on amateur level and is lavishly produced input revaluate steadily, if not consumed him.
If we shift our communication in publication Network (hereby I mean not the simple internet) we may not inspiring objects no longer of this world longer consider it necessary. We have to take responsibility for their communication in the sense of excitement, dissemination and assessment when the future Sense should not be an adolescent. The days of 'power toy' is over: Let us finally play on doors and do not as if the resulting network is not an effective reality, but a crazy "cyberspace" in which only a few stray depend Ghetto Kids! who receives nothing, not existing in the network society - at commenting may soon be no more. Take care!
time: time? It's about time!
Status: overwritten and finally at the end: Good night!
Occasion: scholars to sleep through the Internet
0 comments:
Post a Comment