Calgary Heating And Electric Costs Estimator

The nature of media-Bitches

Everyone knows the moment in life where you realize that the pig through the neighboring village and is not driven by own. In most cases, this neighboring village, a youth camp with banner ads and the media a very young, impressionable audience. For example, the German music channel have already produced quite a few pigs.

Think of Gülcan, Eni van de artist name, the new pretty boy with no name of Viva or this is self-signed duo Claassen and beanpole: pedophile pop stars, where the artificial applause is bewildered adolescent somehow gone to his head. It's real always interesting that these people take some time really seriously. What humor

know these people? You know the smile that you are aware of the hatred, they are aware of the charts as a means of their first-hype. But the excitement and entertainment they produce normal people who have displaced Christian Ulmen, Nora Tschirner, Schlingensief, Raab and Charlotte R.? Your Freakness alone is the Handedness, the self-praise, the tribute of their own self purpose in the casual role of a facilitator. You are seeking what many teenagers: The simulated Bewusstsin of self-importance - these are based now on a job in the media, on a play feature of the personality or the loss of the special non-commitment unit complements long enough about the opening of the mouth to cover up by invading program events .

Most of these pigs are signs of embarrassment, that works as a screen for young people. The Wohlfühlkonzpt the youth channel is a nest of "I-white-and-not-why-I-just-look at all the" posturing that will accompany them with cameras and revive with studio audience clapping. The

But try as they Kameranuckler Claassen-man and his bird in Gosejohann-style (after all, who has practiced the rocking early in his life) to make Street Comedy has to do with the normal self-esteem anymore. These people, who are used, that their appearance is pure from their usual U14 audience already perceived as a kind of cool and funny, have no street sense of humor. That are both as a duo, here is already significant: If they did not acknowledge each other, they would probably see already on the set that no one laughs at them.

Gosejohann tries to provoke and taboos the public address and does it without hesitation fun of himself. Even Elton, who actually is not funny, makes fun at himself. The new pigs are the Jugenfernsehens but since its existence - as above - busy somehow, to come selbstbelustigt and no longer able to risk themselves or others. If they were to meet me in town: I was wasting time so, any identity, authenticity can be seen in her eyes and would give them compassionate with the way that it can create all: even you! But the biographies of these people know no failure. Probably they are even proud of himself themselves and believe they have something real.

time: during the ProSieben show
Status: incredibly bored by the sows in the neighboring village and drunk.
Occasion: Claassen, and the other would be what with the microphone and the Möchtergern alternative style

Peter Reinhart Bread Baker Apprentice

Individual ideology

when the idea to think beyond themselves, would not it logical? What if the policy itself is an ideology and its dissemination needs said pointedly brainwashed? Some rumors even of a post-ideological era, because the known Orientation patterns are there. Does this trend then the social as an ideology, an ideology of solidarity and the political in excess of the selfishness?

Of course, here the term 'ideology' - probably as misunderstood reimport this old German concept of education - first of its negative connotation free: An ideology is not an aberration, not irrationality, not a blind following a sectarian cult with crude assumptions. The ideology is a perfect idea of this world and the derived logic for thinking and acting. In his previous role was the Enlightenment ideology of a progressive thinking, no base for deadlock blame or somewhat conservative. That the term now in common usage for something rigid, absolute, backward-looking as we owe to the defamation of the 60s: a derogatory term for all battle fronts.

The ideology is therefore to be something political, since it is based on the conviction of an idea that goes beyond the self also, because it contains the whole world as normative. But conversely, the political always an ideology? Here, opinions differ .. Is the harsh reality of this world is not a structure that is already inherent in the logic of a policy that one would ask. Are our political actions allegedly anything at all outside of the existing discourse of the possibilities of our actions in advance but defined and limited? Others would perhaps put the 'pragmatics' as an example, that political action can also be non-ideological.

I do not think that the political is logical: those who can afford it, will abstain from progressive ideology - Marx knew the way, always been that people first go together really dirty needs in order to change this world somehow fundamentally . Does the policy so indoctrinated in the luxury children's brains and snob imitators? And who would do this? I do not think that something like this can be institutionalized. There has probably contribute to each his part. Even our young people looking for meaning and ideas for this world. Let's show them that no one thought them decreases, and each must develop its own ideology.

time: pre-ideological
Status: drunken sense of mission
Occasion: rescue the concept of ideology.

Attracted To Big Nose

the Pope a philosopher?

to sell snacks intellectuals, is really a tough business - unless you are a pope, and finally accepted the existence of elastic stockings in this world. Is our little Petrusini Eniz actually the philosopher on earth - as Catholics believe? What is the difference between leader and pastor?

There is no: fanatic, a media forum which is necessary in order to spread their faith in an absolute truth and falsehood .. where there's the difference? Both are anti-modern. Both maintain an ideology at the expense of others, based on exclusion and conjures an ordered world, if you just follow the leaders. The legitimacy of the pastors and leaders is pseudo-democratic, and ultimately a monarchist top-down approach of the rule and its principal subsequent objectives is always power.

course you need power to shape the world. The leader also needs to be impaired and is therefore anti-intellectual and anti-enlightenment. His image of man is effectively a hierarchy in terms of ideology. Anyone who does not follow anyone who does not look up is stupid and retarded. How can it be that something historically outdated such as nationalism, race, ideology, religion, fascism and mindless ideology bondage can be represented as modern, as trend is established in naive minds? Who has made man spoils the free thinking? Where does the desire for the Middle Ages?

No idea comes from nothing. We are intellectuals in Europe had only further because we stand for in scholasticism, the Greeks and Romans with their thinking, her curiosity, her writings have taken serious again. The text-exegesis more then one day your own Experiment, the experiential knowledge (I am deliberately not empirical, as the term is totgezählt) to be in technocratic fantasies of a controllable world lead, on which they built our present-day democracies yet. Enlightenment and later romance and human rights established then the people as a benchmark for the world and especially the Enlightenment did a nice concept of 'ideology' as something progressive, following as an idea of logic, which was directed towards the future and overcoming dark Not thinking of the people.

What say this historical demolition: Better thinking means work. The leader and shepherd principle is an ideology in which the thought does not Means more work.

I think though, that the pope wants the bottom of his human heart something good for this world. But he believes further that the power of the church is the key for this, and replace its ideological hubris that all philosophy and each independent thinking should, must and will. Who is talking to such a person? Who lays claim to something like "dialogue" to name? Anyone who follows an asshole? The lazy thinking people in this world ..

. PS: The fact that his interview with Peter Seewald asshole / Pope also called "Light of the World" is, of course, is a nerve: The light in this world is, of course wieterhin the Enlightenment (English: enlightenment, French: Lumière)

time: to the world order
Status: bars smoke and bar beer in the skull
Occasion: The pope considers himself an intellectual, and we hear too

Authorize Propellerheads Record Hack

Feed me, feed back, feed

I think our network society has a problem: the long line. I just got a couple of times already expressed about the proliferation principle and annoyed that people are not particularly wise to that. They still believe as an endpoint of communication. Are only a mob and mark animals avant-garde?

consumption and sending in equivalent of the network society. This can take quite a lot yet, but the fact that we humans will not be a Kopfendbahnhof but a relay, which has for failure by management, any social significance, does not fit the serious or serious. Also I have in me a deep reluctance to see the hype and the opportunistic human flesh before me, which generate their meaning only through the hype and nothing else, know as the trend by taking part gained sex for hire.

This Resist course has to do with avant-garde, unfortunately, nothing. The benefits of the new media by our elites (the intelligentsia would be an exaggeration ..) is usually characterized by the attempt itself as a node to be transmitted as Emphasising. The Critical has his earnestness his mobility is lost and creates nasty Un experiments of people who see themselves as part of a civic or academic public, and the marketers (One only watch the perceived majority of the professionally motivated Twitter users) are somehow this serious group even if they have anything critical numbers except itself.

The curiosity of sending, at Botschaft-/Werbungs-Verbreitungs-Kanälen dominated the thinking and the use of the new social network media. Consuming and recording, to be inspired actually unprofessional and private, to indulge in the drugs of the networks is Exception, and if only it comes, it will remain private, is not it just passed, the Elitar or Elitärin is too vain, his Un-speed ready-to admit his Inspiriernötigkeit - and denies that the principle of the network society: passing through individuals. One has to wonder

not that new media is not a new civilization: It promotes no one, it spreads no one. To bring it to a relevant end avantgarde thesis: The experiment is already treated before its popularity as a dirty, provocative trend and viewed with distrustful or hostile. But this brake, this non-communication is equal irrelevance.

It reminds me somehow to small, committed groups in the culture medium cities who want theater CSFE although regularly in their city, but only to recommend them to neighbors, to maintain the critical distance and to occur. The avant-garde would probably take possession of the stage, until they again yields something of value.

love So attending from the experiment: Feed Back, Feed forth or make it yourself! You no longer complains about this world or ear are still what you like to criticize: Prole uninspired with canon and without good performance. So, ask yourself: Have you changed the known world today or did you at least help to get an inspiration and Spread?


time: after 12
Status: still exhausted from Friday.
Occasion: is Disseminating scissor thing on his mind.

Rsvp Card Wording Alergies

forth the virtue of their weakness and emancipatory potential

The weakness of pisses me off slowly. Not the fact that people have weaknesses, but the lobbyists for the weakness, trying to explain to us all, it was great to think nothing of indulging easy ways to let yourself fall into the lap of ideologies. They exaggerate the Schwachsein as meaning, as humanity, as maturity. What's that about?

To clarify one thing: humanity has to do with inadequacy, to do with understanding of ways of becoming, with humility before one's own limits and problems of others. No one is without reason that he is - who out here is that we can not recognize that is something different. But if man is a story as we can, as can be assessed even if he sees himself as flotsam?

When you experience fluctuations, or fluctuations devotes extra, as I here, this is a beautiful thing. If one the moment when one does not want to see more as a doer, normalized, are you from the responsibility. Who has an interest? I as a private person anyway. There is an alternative movement against gravity. The loss of control is the biggest test of their composure, resilience, independence of the Court's exterior.

But not to me in the bosom of the church, the various ideologies of neoliberalism, or to put those who want them must think for ourselves. Who's weakness as normally defined, is superficially tolerant compared to naive, I suspect. He wants the people do not take seriously collect revenue, but. He is the patron in the confessional, draws from the humiliation of his absolute authority. Disgusting!

The weakness is restricted or universal, but something original. Something that at least directed against something is or wants to go somewhere. Is not the case, will be the Pied Piper.

time: morning, but the last evening is still unfinished
Status: Drunk
commemoration: will be vulnerability to political correctness promoted

Pregnant Or Menopause Quiz

it can still give to Black's own emancipation?

That fits so like chalk and cheese: Since I am working on 'independence' and Alice Schwarzer and Minister Krisitna Schroeder, a would-be intellectuals duel deliver on the dominance of the discourse on feminism. The discourse that dealt more with the emancipation and entbrauchte this term, unfortunately, for its purposes.

that is dedicated to drunk man feminism appears first as a bad idea. Funny you have about the ladies so no longer do. The others succumb to schadenfreude. Find the confrontation of the two ladies very exemplary, as artikluieren here two attitudes.

The one willing to somehow cope with this harsh world, to separate the multiple roles women schizophrenic and has also saddled the intellectual task, their determination and their biological sex of their identity as a woman or man. All this by still confident and confident in life are and make a career, chauvinistic men, the front bidder, perhaps even children kriegend. I'm not a fan of Schroeder, but that was it, and many other women can be as a performance. could afford

The other is a man who has done all his life intellectual rigor, and lead a fight (a tough) to selbstgerrechte, high-handed men in positions of power needed. For you is the feminism of the new revolutionary Marxism (the kind of Marxism, the proletariat into interpreted as the subject of the story so and soon longed for), which is the definitive solution to the complexity, and can only end in the extinction of power - or should or must. The final solution for the structural inequality between people with different roles than in a systematic and cynical hatred assumed situation. The uncertainty of the Old and securing a separate action item for a political notion of an oppressed group is the power of Black women (I think she calls herself Mrs.). She has produced a voice and raised with theoretical rigor.

First, it is sometimes stated that the individual reality is definitely pragmatic. It is also clear that feminism and gender studies are somewhat different. Both are seen purely intellectual opponents. The one speaks of the theoretical freedom of man, the other by determining differences based on gender.

Schroeder calls right that there should be more men fighting for the freedom of women, Black goes on to say in their severity, that men are the structural reasons for women's oppression. Both in my opinion have a problem: both are not near the point of emancipation.

honest: who comes here is the philosophical attitude to start with a 'self-imposed immaturity' after? The eternal claim that emancipation had something to do with external reasons - namely, with the men and the patriarchy - to do has given us the idiotic girls and women who believe Emazipation have to do with something that they are respected, just because they are women. The self-liberation through the difficult intellectual task to discover for themselves what one seems easy, what one has been set as the roller into the cradle, which form this company to a close approach and helps: The skip the most, because their self-confidence are told only on the basis of their sex.

The possible outcome of this exemption will each be a personal pragmatics: not completely free of gender. I'm sorry ..

This emancipation can not be solved by the fact that the outside world - say the men - changed. The persistence of this claim is still correct, but to the many future generations with female sex sham. The idea of the world as external debt structure of male black woman has this pedagogical effect. Mrs. Schroeder is pragmatic and calls within the meaning of gender Kodetermination and men who work on the role of people with the opposite sex. And the reality of life requires active heterosexual women miteinzuschließen in thinking.

I'm sorry Mrs. Black: You are no longer working on the problem-solving, as they overwhelmed the pragmatic nature and in conflict with their role as the singular biography. Mrs. Schroeder tried to think after all - though it has so many other roles and jobs, they must meet. Since its dogma and orthodoxy help anyone, black woman. Do they still part of the fun? Good thing they have children who would probably treat them as their relentless Krisitna model child.

PS: The conservative image of the family of the CDU-Schröder, is on the afferent their ideological thinking is, of course, contrary to me. Another reason for emancipation: Children and men are no independent meaning in life, but a dependent.

time: too late to secure terrain
state: questionable .
Occasion: The Black is senile and wants to kill women who themselves . Think

How Many Members For Gym

Searches for B-wisdom of my existence in the network

Get just sick and lying in bed with a weak head. I notice how my day really an unproductive deeply unnerved. I need a rhythm of doing, the world order of publication to make me feel good . In my current physical condition I'm not sure if my account of this deep need or sickness, the nausea. 'Leave a message'

for me nothing of a diary: it's about the quick rush that attempt to quickly capture an aspect with pointed words to let me participate and others and remind them to. My Drunken Wisdom (B-Wisdom) drunken and news are here nunmal concept. 'Automatic writing' of the Surrealists and Gonzo journalism, a la Thompson HT my brothers or sisters are in this sense, the diatribe and the speakers philosophers forgotten ancestors of my word-doing. What is this urge me if the lack of such activities regularly frustration promises?

I do not know, honestly. Internet addiction? Not really: I do not hang on the net, but seek communication. Selfishness? For that I am very interested in a solution and take the failure of my drunken (or today, sick) in states like buying. Loss of control? This is an attempt to arrange this world - if and unconventional - to present. Missionary? For that I take myself as a person, not serious enough. Hate? For that I am very humanitarian. The fear of intellectually stunted? Maybe. The experiment? The fact that I can somehow drunk, I've long since proven. For the audience? This I know very little and it has often expressed as a fan and called for a continuation. For the fame? Make sure I spend enough time with the spread of my posts. For money? Look at the buttons on Flattr.

There probably is no external reason or flat-psychological explanation for my actions I am not fixing this blog because I am a failure should surrender, and I get no feedback and feel my weakness, not as a sign that would make a meaningful distribution.

I love the rhetoric and the forms of acting texts, the cast of the speech the ugly shadow of demagogic mass murderer again and predict an un-sober communications over short pieces again. It's a bit sad that many non-readers and readers of this blog but practice this form of discourse is not itself or attaches to the dialogue. To give

a fraction of my thoughts on at least one detectable site and to convince the world of the controversy and the productivity of self-experimentation and subjective texts do I continue .. and I need this mission because this world is so backward in their potential, that the pain caused by the large number of stillbirths head again with the pain of the drunken naive polemic must be confronted in order to rethink the future. Anything else would be flat and satisfies only technocratic intensity but not me.

I bracuhe no 'I do' for my existence, but an 'I knew' about the old life with his limited barriers to overcome theses to the world can. If anyone is looking:: All right, I'm not afraid to operate openly artistic research. I put A drunken B-Weiser-thinking so we can all finally shelved C can say that would be at least a nice side effect of my performance here. Drunk, I have to write even without this effect to this dead world ever harming - even if it reaches no one. In this regard, I probably calm down somehow but my intellectual conscience ..

time: Metazeit
Status: sick and couplers to
Occasion: Why am I so unhappy when I'm blowing the day nothing?

Pokemon Emerald Stores

The renaissance of the nobility and the new Social

If the membership of the needle really what drives us? Is that the only vestige of civilization in our pseudo-social future? What about nesting? What game? What Reproduction? What distinguishes us from the past? It can not be lasting progress if we still idolize the nobility.

All anthropoligisch something, right? But now let's face it: If everyone would just put up, and so behave: What can come out? The desire for power would say the realists. The idealists believe in learning and standards-setting people - ultimately, a brand of realism. The fundamental question is whether we continue to develop socially - and even global in scale!

I feel comfort and luxury in the sense of technical progress is not as a development: Just because I am an atomic bomb, a washing machine or have a car, I develop myself socially further. It remains between human culture, which is necessary to social development.

The anthropoligischen constant propagation, play and nest-building have to the test: Do the evolved? For the propagation it needs approval. This, however, been eroded in some developed countries by the Pornofizierung (There is even an Australian group on Facebook, this contest open). The nesting has moved part in the Inter net: common photo albums, shared blogs, fixed Fraundeskreise, phenomenological rooms filled with straw, paint and hens, the one surrounded by cozy: a new level! This is happening in any case somewhat. The game , the ludic: the possibilities have multiplied .. is playing or socially? I do not know .. the ritualized fighting against each other here seems at least an ideology of selfishness not resist to. Ultimately, it is mostly a game of 'power over': except it is gambling.

So, is there something by which we seek individuals' luxury, power, and marrying into the aristocracy? All three aspects are probably lost their way for many hints and conditions for "independence." This view is of course incredible and unexplained unliberated.

How much to invest every day still really in the trans-and supra-individual cultivation of things that do not fall into that false image of independence, I ask you? What kind of social issues we produce? Is it enough for the people in the long run, reproduction and nesting to an aesthetic? Sounds to me very primitive an .. we reduce our social behavior to that? So just very Nietzschean terms what difference to the animals and the people of the past you tried or seen it in you?

The term "social media" is at least some window dressing, since it first arrives on the culture of the social. Everything else is realistic networks and bride added new forms of nest building. The first two aspects refer to the desire to be part of supposedly "better" formerly called "nobility."

that we have forced the pedigree chauvinists like Guttenberg, to put her "on" when they come in a government office, here is another symptom. This is a Frecheit and no name for a Democrat who feels under the same man. We are not pseudo-democracy, as the British, English or others looking up: that is, at least to me schizophrenic. A rare respect towards Austria: Habsburg monarchs are your ass, and rightly so. She even mocked her on TV! Consideration .. the French have quite a few heads may roll their leviathans. I not return to an elite eugenics à la Sarazin wants .. nothing happens in our society is breeding and linearizations ..

time: dark times
Status: informed

Occasion: The last local post and my eyes are deep into the glass

Knit Baby Sling Pattern

independence, high standards and communication - zombies take over the world

Independence an exciting moment in human existence . There will be on this blog this is definitely a series of texts. It is the Unwünschenswerte a socially idealized world and at the same time, the concept of the most is out of the mouth, one would ask passers-by. And it also produces very very ugly people ..

pseudo-dialogues that allow
is cold, put
The calculations in the foreground, zynisieren
civility as Smalltalk, meet the nice on the head,
humanity not know can not trust
the world as a disappointing consumer offer to design
reify all men, as hasty judgments stupid things
establish this as a quick wit exaggerate,
a posh clique
increase as escape the demands again and again in terms of convenience and luxury,
only rich, want to fuck perfect people confuse
style with money to invest
further into the cycle of cold self,
be by shrinking circle of friends and growing circle of acquaintances more and more forced into a role that is condescending and independently experienced this world, harder than fate sees
always difficult to imagine alternatives, as the yardstick, the pride has long since become a limbo pole of money and status, you may only drunk and less out of your mind .. or if no one looks to be
while any gossip of any fact behind, the other denies pride or a career without entitlement to friends and friends revealed
uncertainty deny at all costs, while an expert on weaknesses of others. Is this the price of independence? Have not they human zombie mix of rotten and offensive communication needs a future? Are we all American Bitches? filled

Surrounded by objectivity, rationality, a world of sighted ruling without mercy with care of social decline, armed with all the superficial weapons of this world to hold positions, the 'I' to defend a position in his cave with a hollow sense of dying, tied to the consumer world with attractions, where one locates oneself available to its choice of partner or career ... there is this world in diseased minds and infect the people we know.

I personally surprise to people who like to consider them as I am human, philosophical, worldly, visionary and knowledgeable. The young would-be aristocrats who rely on their descent from the money, respond to challenges mostly with clothing and other critics Distinktionssicherheiten and disappear quickly contemptible in their environment. Because you remember most, that surprise their wit someone has to hurt, to be truly and leave the field. You can not win.

affluent males in these groups of course I'm interested in hetero- only in passing. Women have generally maintained their appearance, their visual proximity to men with dreams of wealth are the same and poor, and not free: on the contrary! Women from such monetary communities are to achieve even more difficult to stabilize themselves in their disease. They have the path of inspiration - so do not state a consumer - long since left and are looking for people to review visual features and codes. People who do not fit into the scheme there will be replaced with professional cold or injured. I call it "visual deterioration" or "Look people: your zombie existence is socially accepted and established in our media images as normal. No one is helping these poor things.

There is no functioning three-circle more. The 'claim' to dominate and kill - in the sense of personal circles in which you are stuck and the money and consumer demands - the 'independence', the 'claim' to kill in his jaded, negative form, the 'communication' with the world.

This special three-way relationship from claim, independence and communication says a lot about the way out of people. The ugly faces of a chichi scene - which in my opinion, strengthened in recent years and growing - has no idea of this structure somehow. Especially the way pretty women in this world I've described above, un-independent and predictable, Despite the fact that they try the opposite: But you are looking for the needle and can get rid of this urge is very rare.

These people need shocks to wake up, they need the improbability that someone does not need the environment to be somebody that wisdom has nothing to do with ancestry that visual fascism is not an aid to concentration, but outsources only the disturbing, the the diversity of this world only regardless of the Aryan-elitist claim makes spiral in which they are caught miserably. What claims cultivated her? How often do you leave on your eyes?

time: varies even on my watch
Status: helping.
Occasion: wondered about pride in the chichi Puff of life