That fits so like chalk and cheese: Since I am working on 'independence' and Alice Schwarzer and Minister Krisitna Schroeder, a would-be intellectuals duel deliver on the dominance of the discourse on feminism. The discourse that dealt more with the emancipation and entbrauchte this term, unfortunately, for its purposes.
that is dedicated to drunk man feminism appears first as a bad idea. Funny you have about the ladies so no longer do. The others succumb to schadenfreude. Find the confrontation of the two ladies very exemplary, as artikluieren here two attitudes.
The one willing to somehow cope with this harsh world, to separate the multiple roles women schizophrenic and has also saddled the intellectual task, their determination and their biological sex of their identity as a woman or man. All this by still confident and confident in life are and make a career, chauvinistic men, the front bidder, perhaps even children kriegend. I'm not a fan of Schroeder, but that was it, and many other women can be as a performance. could afford
The other is a man who has done all his life intellectual rigor, and lead a fight (a tough) to selbstgerrechte, high-handed men in positions of power needed. For you is the feminism of the new revolutionary Marxism (the kind of Marxism, the proletariat into interpreted as the subject of the story so and soon longed for), which is the definitive solution to the complexity, and can only end in the extinction of power - or should or must. The final solution for the structural inequality between people with different roles than in a systematic and cynical hatred assumed situation. The uncertainty of the Old and securing a separate action item for a political notion of an oppressed group is the power of Black women (I think she calls herself Mrs.). She has produced a voice and raised with theoretical rigor.
First, it is sometimes stated that the individual reality is definitely pragmatic. It is also clear that feminism and gender studies are somewhat different. Both are seen purely intellectual opponents. The one speaks of the theoretical freedom of man, the other by determining differences based on gender.
Schroeder calls right that there should be more men fighting for the freedom of women, Black goes on to say in their severity, that men are the structural reasons for women's oppression. Both in my opinion have a problem: both are not near the point of emancipation.
honest: who comes here is the philosophical attitude to start with a 'self-imposed immaturity' after? The eternal claim that emancipation had something to do with external reasons - namely, with the men and the patriarchy - to do has given us the idiotic girls and women who believe Emazipation have to do with something that they are respected, just because they are women. The self-liberation through the difficult intellectual task to discover for themselves what one seems easy, what one has been set as the roller into the cradle, which form this company to a close approach and helps: The skip the most, because their self-confidence are told only on the basis of their sex.
The possible outcome of this exemption will each be a personal pragmatics: not completely free of gender. I'm sorry ..
This emancipation can not be solved by the fact that the outside world - say the men - changed. The persistence of this claim is still correct, but to the many future generations with female sex sham. The idea of the world as external debt structure of male black woman has this pedagogical effect. Mrs. Schroeder is pragmatic and calls within the meaning of gender Kodetermination and men who work on the role of people with the opposite sex. And the reality of life requires active heterosexual women miteinzuschließen in thinking.
I'm sorry Mrs. Black: You are no longer working on the problem-solving, as they overwhelmed the pragmatic nature and in conflict with their role as the singular biography. Mrs. Schroeder tried to think after all - though it has so many other roles and jobs, they must meet. Since its dogma and orthodoxy help anyone, black woman. Do they still part of the fun? Good thing they have children who would probably treat them as their relentless Krisitna model child.
PS: The conservative image of the family of the CDU-Schröder, is on the afferent their ideological thinking is, of course, contrary to me. Another reason for emancipation: Children and men are no independent meaning in life, but a dependent.
time: too late to secure terrain
state: questionable .
Occasion: The Black is senile and wants to kill women who themselves . Think
0 comments:
Post a Comment