to sell snacks intellectuals, is really a tough business - unless you are a pope, and finally accepted the existence of elastic stockings in this world. Is our little Petrusini Eniz actually the philosopher on earth - as Catholics believe? What is the difference between leader and pastor?
There is no: fanatic, a media forum which is necessary in order to spread their faith in an absolute truth and falsehood .. where there's the difference? Both are anti-modern. Both maintain an ideology at the expense of others, based on exclusion and conjures an ordered world, if you just follow the leaders. The legitimacy of the pastors and leaders is pseudo-democratic, and ultimately a monarchist top-down approach of the rule and its principal subsequent objectives is always power.
course you need power to shape the world. The leader also needs to be impaired and is therefore anti-intellectual and anti-enlightenment. His image of man is effectively a hierarchy in terms of ideology. Anyone who does not follow anyone who does not look up is stupid and retarded. How can it be that something historically outdated such as nationalism, race, ideology, religion, fascism and mindless ideology bondage can be represented as modern, as trend is established in naive minds? Who has made man spoils the free thinking? Where does the desire for the Middle Ages?
No idea comes from nothing. We are intellectuals in Europe had only further because we stand for in scholasticism, the Greeks and Romans with their thinking, her curiosity, her writings have taken serious again. The text-exegesis more then one day your own Experiment, the experiential knowledge (I am deliberately not empirical, as the term is totgezählt) to be in technocratic fantasies of a controllable world lead, on which they built our present-day democracies yet. Enlightenment and later romance and human rights established then the people as a benchmark for the world and especially the Enlightenment did a nice concept of 'ideology' as something progressive, following as an idea of logic, which was directed towards the future and overcoming dark Not thinking of the people.
What say this historical demolition: Better thinking means work. The leader and shepherd principle is an ideology in which the thought does not Means more work.
I think though, that the pope wants the bottom of his human heart something good for this world. But he believes further that the power of the church is the key for this, and replace its ideological hubris that all philosophy and each independent thinking should, must and will. Who is talking to such a person? Who lays claim to something like "dialogue" to name? Anyone who follows an asshole? The lazy thinking people in this world ..
. PS: The fact that his interview with Peter Seewald asshole / Pope also called "Light of the World" is, of course, is a nerve: The light in this world is, of course wieterhin the Enlightenment (English: enlightenment, French: Lumière)
time: to the world order
Status: bars smoke and bar beer in the skull
Occasion: The pope considers himself an intellectual, and we hear too
0 comments:
Post a Comment