If the membership of the needle really what drives us? Is that the only vestige of civilization in our pseudo-social future? What about nesting? What game? What Reproduction? What distinguishes us from the past? It can not be lasting progress if we still idolize the nobility.
All anthropoligisch something, right? But now let's face it: If everyone would just put up, and so behave: What can come out? The desire for power would say the realists. The idealists believe in learning and standards-setting people - ultimately, a brand of realism. The fundamental question is whether we continue to develop socially - and even global in scale!
I feel comfort and luxury in the sense of technical progress is not as a development: Just because I am an atomic bomb, a washing machine or have a car, I develop myself socially further. It remains between human culture, which is necessary to social development.
The anthropoligischen constant propagation, play and nest-building have to the test: Do the evolved? For the propagation it needs approval. This, however, been eroded in some developed countries by the Pornofizierung (There is even an Australian group on Facebook, this contest open). The nesting has moved part in the Inter net: common photo albums, shared blogs, fixed Fraundeskreise, phenomenological rooms filled with straw, paint and hens, the one surrounded by cozy: a new level! This is happening in any case somewhat. The game , the ludic: the possibilities have multiplied .. is playing or socially? I do not know .. the ritualized fighting against each other here seems at least an ideology of selfishness not resist to. Ultimately, it is mostly a game of 'power over': except it is gambling.
So, is there something by which we seek individuals' luxury, power, and marrying into the aristocracy? All three aspects are probably lost their way for many hints and conditions for "independence." This view is of course incredible and unexplained unliberated.
How much to invest every day still really in the trans-and supra-individual cultivation of things that do not fall into that false image of independence, I ask you? What kind of social issues we produce? Is it enough for the people in the long run, reproduction and nesting to an aesthetic? Sounds to me very primitive an .. we reduce our social behavior to that? So just very Nietzschean terms what difference to the animals and the people of the past you tried or seen it in you?
The term "social media" is at least some window dressing, since it first arrives on the culture of the social. Everything else is realistic networks and bride added new forms of nest building. The first two aspects refer to the desire to be part of supposedly "better" formerly called "nobility."
that we have forced the pedigree chauvinists like Guttenberg, to put her "on" when they come in a government office, here is another symptom. This is a Frecheit and no name for a Democrat who feels under the same man. We are not pseudo-democracy, as the British, English or others looking up: that is, at least to me schizophrenic. A rare respect towards Austria: Habsburg monarchs are your ass, and rightly so. She even mocked her on TV! Consideration .. the French have quite a few heads may roll their leviathans. I not return to an elite eugenics à la Sarazin wants .. nothing happens in our society is breeding and linearizations ..
time: dark times
Status: informed
Occasion: The last local post and my eyes are deep into the glass
0 comments:
Post a Comment